answer:Person1: No emotion - Every country should face the history. Person2: No emotion - Yeah, we don't live in the vacuum. We have traditional values and long but different history. Person1: No emotion - Sometimes, we, human beings, really had done something wrong, so we should admit it at first. Person2: Disgust - But there is always somebody who wants to turn his back on the true history. Person1: No emotion - I believe such things won't be realized, just daydreaming.

answer:Mazzy Star was formed first.

answer:1. Miley Cyrus and Katy Perry engage in a war of words over their shared kiss at Cyrus' concert in February. 2. The kiss initially appeared to be a playful reference to Perry's hit song, "I Kissed a Girl." 3. Perry claims Cyrus wanted to take the kiss further, which she was not comfortable with. 4. Miley Cyrus responds to Perry's comment, indirectly mentioning Katy Perry's rumored ex-boyfriend, John Mayer, on Twitter. 5. Despite the slightly bitter exchange, Katy Perry appears to take Miley Cyrus' response in stride.

answer:There could be various reasons why he had not let them know that he was still working on the case. Let's explore some of the possible motives and scenarios, considering both perspectives - his own and the people involved who expected updates on the case progress. 1. Confidentiality and safety concerns: In some cases, revealing the ongoing investigation status to individuals or groups may cause panic, arouse suspicion or result in alerting the subjects under investigation. These could negatively impact the progress of the case and even put the investigator or others at risk. 2. Fear of interference: The individual working on the case might be concerned about external pressures or influences exerted on the investigation if they shared their ongoing work. In some instances, they might prefer to withhold information until they reach a significant breakthrough that would be more conclusive and leave less room for outside tampering or interference. 3. Desire for independent work: It's possible that the investigator values their autonomy and prefers working independently on cases without constantly updating concerned parties. This might stem from their personality, work style, or previous experiences where collaboration may have led to complications in case resolution. 4. Need for time and space: The investigator might have realized that the case is more complicated than initially assumed and requires a deeper analysis. By not disclosing the ongoing work, the investigator can buy time and space to explore the case without external pressure or the burden of expectations from others. 5. Lack of significant progress: Sometimes, investigators might not have concrete updates to share due to the nature of the case or challenges they encountered. In such scenarios, they might choose to withhold information until they have significant findings or breakthroughs that would be worthwhile to share. As for the second question, "Why hadn't he mentioned he was still on the case?" - Yes, it essentially follows the same meaning, but it is phrased slightly differently. Both questions convey the same idea of enquiring as to why the individual did not inform others that they were still working on the case. The difference lies in the use of "hadn't" and "mentioned" in the second question, which implies a slightly more informal and conversational tone. However, both questions are asking for the same insight into the investigator's reasons for keeping the case's ongoing status undisclosed.