Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Given the following question, let's solve step-by-step. Yes / no, is the following a verifiable fact? "Adobe Photoshop can run on both Apple computers and PCs."

answer:To determine if the statement "Adobe Photoshop can run on both Apple computers and PCs" is a verifiable fact, we can follow these steps: Step 1: Identify the claim in the statement The claim is that Adobe Photoshop can run on both Apple computers and PCs. Step 2: Check the source of the claim Adobe is the creator and distributor of Photoshop, so their website or product documentation would be the most reliable source for this information. Step 3: Verify the claim Visit Adobe's official website (https://www.adobe.com/) and look for information about Photoshop's compatibility with different operating systems. Step 4: Analyze the information On Adobe's website, under the Photoshop system requirements (https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/system-requirements.html), you can find information about the supported operating systems. As of October 2021, Adobe Photoshop supports macOS (Apple's operating system) and Windows (PC operating system). Conclusion: Based on the information found on Adobe's official website, the statement "Adobe Photoshop can run on both Apple computers and PCs" is a verifiable fact.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Leo: Premise: "A small kid wearing a helmet smiles while his father is doing some adjustment at its back." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The boy is getting ready to ride a bike." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Mei: OK, So, let's think first... Me:

answer:Based on the given premise, we cannot definitively conclude that the hypothesis "The boy is getting ready to ride a bike" is true. The information provided does not specifically mention a bike or any other activity associated with bike riding. The father could be adjusting a helmet for a different activity, such as skateboarding, rollerblading, or even just for safety reasons. Therefore, the most accurate answer to this question is: - it is not possible to tell

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. A's one day's work = 1/30 B's one day's work = 1/45 (A + B)'s one day's work = 1/30 + 1/45 = 1/18 The part of the work completed in 3 days = 3 (1/18) = 1/6. This justifies what answer for what question? Q & A:

answer:Q: If A can complete a task in 30 days and B can complete the same task in 45 days, how much of the task will they complete together in 3 days? A: Working together, A and B will complete 1/6 of the task in 3 days.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. QUESTION: Premise: "A bunch of people walking down the street." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There is a bunch of dogs running down the street." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's solve it slowly: They are either people or dogs. They can't be both walking and running. The answer is no. [QUESTION] Premise: "Two women eating in front of debenhams." Hypothesis: "The women are sick." Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Eating is usually the last thing a person who is sick would do. The answer is no. Q: Premise: "Two people jogging with water on one side and green leafy trees on the other." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "To people are jogging in the park." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no A: Not all locations with bodies of water and trees are in in a park. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Given the sentence "A group of people gathered around in the dark." can we conclude that "The people are not in the light."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's solve it slowly: In the dark is another way of stating not in the light. The answer is yes. [QUESTION] Test for natural language inference. Premise: "Man jumping from lower roof to higher roof." Hypothesis: "The man is running away." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Jumping from roof to roof does not necessarily indicate running away. The answer is it is not possible to tell. Q: Can we conclude from "A college-aged kid in a light blue striped polo is sleeping in a chair with a book in his hand in what looks like a study space in a library." that "A kid will get a bad grade on his test."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell A:

answer:Sleeping with a book in hand does not directly imply poor performance on a test. The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Released under the Flux License.

has loaded